Daily Kos

Tag: New GI Bill

Thank You

Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 11:34:21 AM PDT

I wanted to take a moment to say thank you to the fine people of DailyKos, MyDD, and NMFBIHOP, for their support in our push to get President Bush to sign the new GI Bill.  On Wednesday, we diaried (kos, mydd, nmfbihop) about Tom's letter to the President urging him to sign the bill.

Click here if you'd still like to sign the letter, it's not too late.

I just wanted to take a moment to point out how much of a help you've all been in this process.  This was the map when we posted on Wednesday:

Poll

Will You Add Your Name to the List?

50%22 votes
4%2 votes
45%20 votes

| 44 votes | Vote | Results

GI Bill Still in Limbo: What might happen

Thu Jun 12, 2008 at 05:56:13 AM PDT

It's been a little quiet on this issue the last week or so considering that we have Obama - McCain kickoff and veepstakes emerging. Also, Congress has blocked the Climate Change legislation as well as tax on windfall oil profits. However, we must not forget that the passage of the GI Bill is extremely important right now.

Again, please support those that are running against those that voted against this bill. If anything sending those Senators a message will put some heat back on Bush to sign this bill.

I also ask that you sign this petition being sent to Jeff Sessions (my Senator), one of those in opposition. I know Rick Noriega has done something similar in Texas.

sign petitions

Poll

What will Bush do on GI Bill

46%7 votes
6%1 votes
40%6 votes
6%1 votes

| 15 votes | Vote | Results

Tom Udall Writes to President Bush: Support Our Troops

Wed Jun 11, 2008 at 04:23:12 PM PDT

Tom Udall has made veterans' issues a centerpiece of his campaign.  On May 8th, we asked this community to become citizen co-sponsors of the new GI Bill.

But George W. Bush is still refusing to sign this bill.  That's why Tom Udall stood in front of a gathering of veterans and concerned citizens on Saturday at Bataan Memorial Park in Albuquerque to launch Veterans for Udall by signing, along with over a hundred others, a letter to President Bush urging him to sign the new GI Bill.

But we need all the help we can get, which is why we're asking all of our supporters to sign the letter as well.  Supporters from all over the country have signed the letter, and we've created a map of those supporters and their messages to show how broad the support is for this bill.


Image of the GI Bill supporter map.  Click to see the interactive map.

Video, and what you can do to help, below the fold...

Poll

Will you sign the letter, and tell George W. Bush that our veterans deserve a 21st Century GI Bill?

58%17 votes
3%1 votes
31%9 votes
6%2 votes

| 29 votes | Vote | Results

This GI Bill Debate Turns My Stomach

Fri May 23, 2008 at 01:25:07 AM PDT

Maybe it’s because I am a veteran, or maybe it’s because I just feel it’s the right thing to do, but support for our troops is one of the most important political issues to me, right behind foreign policy and the health of the economy. But reading Senator McCain’s remarks directed at Senator Obama over this new bill just makes me absolutely sick.

Action Diary: Become a Citizen Co-Sponsor of the New GI Bill

Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:07:10 PM PDT

 title=

Tom Udall is calling on you to join him in co-sponsoring the new GI Bill.  The original GI Bill ensured that a generation of American veterans were able to return from World War II and get a quality, four year college education.

The new GI Bill will ensure that post-9/11 veterans are entitled to the same full four year college education.  You can help pass this bill by adding your name to the growing list of citizen co-sponsors.

A letter from Tom, below the fold...

Shocker: GOP plays politics with veterans!

Fri May 02, 2008 at 10:40:21 AM PDT

Via Think Progress:

On Tuesday, around 100 veterans and a dozen congressmen gathered on Capitol Hill to rally in support of Sen. Jim Webb’s (D-VA) 21st Century G.I. Bill, which boasts the bipartisan support of 56 cosponsors.

In seeking the support of Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) — whom Webb said "needs to get on the bill" in order to secure more Republican support — Webb told McCain "several times that this is not a political issue." Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE) pointed to the bill’s bipartisan support: "[P]eople like John Warner and James Inhofe are on it."

According to the Congressional record, however, Inhofe (R-OK) quietly removed his name from the list of cosponsors on Tuesday — the same day as the Capitol Hill rally.

Here's just one of the ways that presidential politics intrudes on Congressional politics.

Everyone knows that Jim Webb's "New GI Bill" is a no-brainer. The recruits we've sent to Iraq and Afghanistan in exchange for promises of educational benefits absolutely must get their due. But current law gives them a mere pittance compared to what the actual costs of going to college are. Webb's bill seeks to remedy that, boosting the assistance to a level that's actually capable of giving our veterans a decent shot at paying the bills at a decent school.

McCain can't afford to be seen as being against that. But because he's running for president on the platform that Democrats are evil terrorists, he also can't be seen cooperating with them (even as they fall over themselves to claim they'll "reach out" and "work with the other side," by the way). So what's a 71 year old whose Sugar Mama wife buys him eight houses and a private jet (but won't release her tax returns) to do?

Why, introduce your own new GI Bill, of course. Or better yet, get a surrogate to do it for you, so that you don't look petty. And that's just what McCain did, with a hat tip to none other than his number one sycophant, the man with whom he teamed up to shamefully surrender his anti-torture principles to Bush, Lindsey Graham.

And now, quietly, the Republicans who were on board with Webb's bill (because remember, it's a no-brainer) begin to discover heretofore unknown reservations about the bill. Reservations which are, of course, magically remedied in McCain's Graham's bill. Or so we're told, anyway. The bill wasn't even introduced until Tuesday. But I'm sure that's plenty of time to become certain about the necessity of withdrawing from a bill you've been a co-sponsor of for two months, as Inhofe did.

So there's your McMaverick, who rises above petty partisan politics in service to our men and women in uniform, America. Webb has worked tirelessly -- in the age of the "60 votes to pass anything" Senate -- to get 56 co-sponsors for his bill. And just as he's nearing the ability to close the deal, McMaverick jets in on the wife's puddle jumper to start peeling people away. In addition to Inhofe, look for Susan Collins (R-ME), Pete Domenici (R-NM), and Joe Lieberman (I-CT) -- who are currently cosponsors of both bills -- to be pressured to drop their support for Webb's.

And why? Over genuine policy differences? Almost certainly not, though that's what their claim will be. No, this will be so that Mr. Republican Presidential Candidate doesn't have to admit he's working with Democrats, even as he campaigns on being the McMaverick who'll cross party lines to do right by our veterans.

Jim Webb has him dead to rights:

"He’s so full of it."

The Doctrine of Support the Troops for Convienence

Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 12:44:50 AM PDT

What does it really mean to support the troops? I think if you asked the average person on the street you would probably hear something along the lines of understanding what our men and women in uniform are sacrificing and making their sacrifice worthwhile. That's pretty simple, right? You would probably hear something to the tune of recognizing that the members of our Armed Forces--past, present, and future--have put and are putting their lives at risk so the rest of the country can live comfortably and chase the American Dream. That American Dream--a chance to raise a family, own a home, live comfortably without worrying about basic needs like food, water and safety--is something that all Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, and Marines strive for. We don't do this for free, but it's not only about monetary compensation that keeps us in uniform. The debate we hear in Washington on supporting the troops is very different from these ideas.

Podcast interview with Chair of House Armed Services Subcommittee on Military Personnel

Fri Apr 04, 2008 at 04:20:12 AM PDT

Crossposted at VetVoice

I am not a veteran and I'm generally not a fan of either our sprawling empire of military bases around the world or of America's ever-growing defense budget.

I do have an interest in veterans issues though and I enjoy reading VetVoice and listening to Paul Rieckhoff's fairly regular appearances on the Rachel Maddow Show on Air America Radio.

I recently had an opportunity to do a podcast interview with Congresswoman Susan Davis (CA-53, San Diego).  Congresswoman Davis sits on the House Armed Services Committee and is actually the chair of the Subcommittee on Military Personnel.  

Poll

Have you ever called you Congressperson - or any Congressperson and asked them to support the New GI Bill (HR 2707 or S. 22)

20%1 votes
40%2 votes
40%2 votes

| 5 votes | Vote | Results


::

Advertise on the Liberal Blog Advertising Network.

Hate ads? Subscribe.






Support Bloggers' Rights!
Support Bloggers' Rights!


On Mothertalkers:

Celebrity Gossip Break: Bette Midler

Australian commission releases gender inequality report

Another Victim of the Housing Crisis

Vacations for Single Parents

Hump Day Open Thread

On Street Prophets:

Building Momentum For Change: Ending the Maze of Injustice

Coffee Hour with Pastor Dan

Why Exactly Are We Going To Saddleback?

Iowa GOP Delegation Blackballs Charles Grassley

The Prayer Closet, a daily prayer request thread