Skip to main content

Some news links regarding developments on Marcellus Shale, Pennsylvania, and related topics. Just FYI.

UPDATE: Please visit these important diaries too:

Stop Tar Sands: While I’ll be Risking Arrest at the White House (and Why You Should, Too)+*
Join the Foes of the Tar Sands Pipeline: Blogathon & DC Civil Disobedience Action
P.M. Steven Harper acting like Canada's George W. Bush on the Tar Sands
US Minerals Management Service launches Bristol Bay drilling review

Please feel free to add your own links in the comments.

Siemens Company develops drilling wastewater treatment process:

Cakes produced daily at Advanced Waste Services in New Castle are not the edible kind.

The dense, 16-square-foot, slate-like rectangles are made entirely of sludge, the dry solid residual that results from treating industrial wastewater. It may sound mundane, but the so-called filter cakes and the technology that produces them are a "perfect storm" of recycling, according to facility manager Pat Russell.

But here's something else to watch for:
Those cakes are placed in landfills; the water is tested again and then discharged to the New Castle Sanitation Authority.
Solid wastes from gas drilling are nto considered hazardous waste under the law (thanks, Dick Cheney, for yet another loophole) and so can de disposed of in regular landfills which occasionally leak.  Remember that the solid wastes contain heavy metals, radioactive, and toxic chemicals used in fracking.

**
Corbett quietly turning off the lights on renewable energy

The Corbett administration is de-emphasizing renewable energy and energy conservation, eliminating programs created by previous Democratic and Republican administrations as it focuses on natural gas energy from booming Marcellus Shale.

Quietly but systematically, the administration has all but shut down the state Department of Environmental Protection's Office of Energy and Technology Deployment -- the state's primary energy office -- and removed directors and reassigned staff in the Office of Energy Management in the Department of General Services and the Governor's Green Government Council.

It has also forbidden state executive agencies from signing contracts that support clean energy supply.

**
Forced pooling for Marcellus Shale gas is nothing more than greed  An opinion piece discussing various points of law regarding forced pooling/eminent domain.

**
Remember how wonderfully responsible oil and gas companies can be, especially when they're given the go ahead to drill in or most fragile environments?

Shell ‘should have been more open about oil spill’

Dr Richard Dixon, director of WWF Scotland, said Shell had been slow to release details of Wednesday’s leak, particularly in light of the Gulf of Mexico disaster last year.

He said: “I think they (Shell) do need to try much harder, particularly when this leak started on Wednesday and it was only on Friday night that we heard anything about it.

**
Shell's drilling off Australia could 'devastate' endangered marine life

"It beggars belief that the government is not requiring a full environmental estimate of this drilling proposal," said Paul Gamblin of the World Wildlife Fund.

Instead, the energy giant must abide by certain conditions, including visual observations for whales. The Australian government said Shell's proposal did not require further assessment.

**
Shell's Arctic Drilling Plan: Another Disaster Waiting to Happen

As I reported in Rolling Stone a year ago, drilling in the Arctic is far more perilous than drilling in temperate southern waters:

    There's no proven technology for cleaning up oil in icy water, which can render skimming boats useless – much less able to cope with a gusher under the ice. In the worst-case scenario, according to marine scientists, a blowout that takes place in the fall, when the seas are freezing over, oil could flow unabated until relief wells could be drilled the following summer.

Shell's just-approved exploration plan does not account for this kind of months-long catastrophe. Its worst-case scenario describes an uncontrolled blowout in lasting just 43 days, resolved by the arrival of another ship, unimpeded by sea ice, to drill a relief well.

Even so, Shell admits that a massive amount of oil would be released into the environment: 400,000 barrels into the Beaufort Sea, or one-and-a-half times the amount of crude spilled by the Exxon Valdez, in 1989. Shell insists, however, that only a small fraction of that – 10 percent – would remain in the environment. "During these 43 days, it is possible that 40,712 [barrels] of oil would escape primary efforts using mechanical recovery."

Leave aside for a moment the question of how Interior could conclude that even a spill of 40,000 barrels of oil would not "significantly affect" the human environment. Shell is telling the government it can recapture 90 percent of any oil that hits the water. Based on past experience, that claim is "absolutely ridiculous," says Rebecca Noblin, Alaska Director for the Center for Biological Diversity. Only 5 percent of oil from the BP disaster was recovered; Exxon Valdez was marginally better: 8 percent.

**
Just sayin'.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Forced pooling. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    marina

    The article was a little vague, but I gather they haven't actually succeeded in passing forced pooling.

    They should definitely not do so, it is a corrupt abuse of the government's eminent domain power.  The historical argument for forced pooling (proper exploitation of an oil/gas field through well placement) does not apply to Shale assets, as each well as a tiny drainage radius and there's essentially no flow through the reservoir as a whole.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site